Introduction
Suspension is a formulation where
insoluble solid is suspended in a liquid when the disperse phase is solid and
the continuous phase is liquid by the aid of suspending agent. There are
certain types of suspension which are oral, topical, parenteral and ophthalmic
suspensions. One of the function of suspension is to mask the bad taste of some
drug. A good suspension should be physically and chemically stable, resistant
to microbial contamination, homogenously dispersed when shaken , easily poured
and consist of uniform dispersed size particles.
Besides, suspension should be able
to redisperse when the solid particles settled. Wetting
agents which is also known as surfactants which should be added because the
drugs are not readily suspended in the liquid medium which is the aqueous
phase. The examples of suspension are tragacanth.Surfactant is use to reduce
the interfacial surface tension between the drug particles and the suspension
vehicles. Other excipients also added to a suspension include preservatives
which is to prevent microbial growth while colouring agent and syrup are to
improve the tasteof the suspension. The advantages of suspension are that it
improves the stability of the active ingredient, palatability and bioavailability
of the formulation. Drugs in suspension are chemically more stable than in a
solution.
Objective
To study the effect of different amount of tragacanth on the sedimentation rates of suspensions.
To study the effect of different amount of tragacanth on the sedimentation rates of suspensions.
Apparatus
1 mL
graduated pipette Pipette
bulb
Weighing
boat Set
of mortar and pestle
50 mL
graduated cyclinder 200 mL
graduated cyclinder
100 mL
beaker Parafilm
Weighing
balance Viscometer
Materials
Chalk Tragacanth
Concentrated
peppermint water Double strength
chloroform water
Distilled
water Syrup
BP
Methodology
1. A
suspension of Pediatric Chalk Mixture (150 mL) was prepared according to the
following formula:
Ingredient
|
Suspension
|
||
A
|
B
|
C
|
|
Chalk (g)
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
Tragacanth (g)
|
0.0
|
0.1
|
0.3
|
Concentrated peppermint
water (mL)
|
0.6
|
0.6
|
0.6
|
Syrup BP (mL)
|
15
|
15
|
15
|
Double Strength Chloroform
water (mL)
|
75
|
75
|
75
|
Distilled water q.s. (mL)
|
150
|
150
|
150
|
2. 5
mL of the suspension was poured into a weighing boat and labelled each
formulation. Observe and compare texture, clarity and colour of each
suspension.
3. The
sedimentation rate of each suspension was determined. The suspension was shook
vigorously until all the particles were uniformly suspended. The time was
noted. The boundary between the sediment and the supernatant was observed the
time it takes for the boundary to pass each 10 mL graduation until the volume
of sediment has reached 80 mL was recorded.
4. The
gradated cylinder was set down on the lab bench and the lab timer was started
at this point.
5. For
suspension A to C, the sedimentation volume of the suspension was recorded at
t=0, 2, 5, 10, 15 and 30 min.
6. The
obtained data was recorded in the table shown in result.
7. The
sedimentation volume ratio was calculated using the following formula:
Sedimentation volume ratio = Hu/Ho
Hu : Ultimate height of the
sediment, i.e., the height of sediment at a particular time
Ho: Initial height of the
total suspension
8. The
ease of re-dispersibility of each formulation was examined after the last
measurement. To do this:
i.
The Parafilm was
snugged on the mouth of the graduated cylinder and the seal was re-enforced
with our gloved hand.
ii.
The number of
inversions it takes to completely re-disperse the drug were counted.
iii.
The observations were recorded.
9. 95
mL of suspension was poured into a 100 ml beaker and the viscosity of the
suspension was determined using viscometer at 12 000 rpm for 2 min.
10. The
data was recorded in the table shown in result.
11. Each
suspension was poured into a plastic bottle.
After storing all the suspensions for a period of 4 days, the ease of
redispersion in each system was determined and the system which is most
acceptable was determined.
Result
Suspension
|
Sedimentation volume at pre-determined time (min)
|
Distinct boundary ( yes/no)
|
|||||
0
|
2
|
5
|
10
|
15
|
30
|
||
A
|
0
|
36
|
20
|
16
|
13
|
12
|
Yes
|
B
|
0
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
6
|
7
|
No
|
C
|
0
|
0
|
0.5
|
0.5
|
1
|
1
|
No
|
Table
1 : The sedimentation volume at pre-determined time (min) of suspensions
Suspension
|
Volume of sedimentation (ml)
|
|||||||||||||||||
A
|
B
|
C
|
||||||||||||||||
0
|
2
|
5
|
10
|
15
|
30
|
0
|
2
|
5
|
10
|
15
|
30
|
0
|
2
|
5
|
10
|
15
|
30
|
|
Initial volume of total suspension (Vo)
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
Ultimate volume of sediment (Vu)
|
0
|
36
|
20
|
16
|
13
|
12
|
0
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
6
|
7
|
0
|
0
|
0.5
|
0.5
|
1
|
1
|
Sedimentation volume ratio (Vu/Vo)
|
0
|
0.36
|
0.20
|
0.16
|
0.13
|
0.12
|
0
|
0.03
|
0.05
|
0.06
|
0.06
|
0.07
|
0
|
0
|
0.005
|
0.005
|
0.01
|
0.01
|
Table 2 : Sedimentation volume ratio of
suspensions
Suspension
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
||||||
Trials
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
Viscosity (cP)
|
0.5
|
0.6
|
0.5
|
0.5
|
1.0
|
1.5
|
1.5
|
1.5
|
2.0
|
Mean
|
0.53
|
1.00
|
1.67
|
||||||
SD
|
0.047
|
0.486
|
0.236
|
Table
3 : The mean of suspension viscosity
Physical
|
Paediatric chalk mixture
|
||
Characteristics
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
Texture
|
Coarse texture, less
viscous
|
Smooth texture,
viscous
|
Very smooth texture,
more viscous
|
Clarity
|
Less cloudy
|
Moderate cloudy
|
Cloudy
|
Colour
|
White
|
White
|
White
|
Table
4 : Comparison between suspensions physical characteristics
Time (min)
|
Volume of
sediment ( mL )
|
||||||||
10
|
20
|
30
|
40
|
50
|
60
|
70
|
80
|
||
Suspension
|
A
|
0.2
|
1.17
|
1.75
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
B
|
>15
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
C
|
>15
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Table
5 : Volume of sediment of each suspensions (mL)
Suspension
|
A
|
B
|
C
|
Number of
inversion
|
2
|
6
|
11
|
Table
6 : Number of inversion for redisperse
Discussion
- Compare and discuss physical appearance
of all suspensions produced.
The
physical appearance of the suspensions is compared based on the texture,
clarity, and color of each suspensions. Texture is determined based on the
appearance, feel or consisting of a surface while clarity is based on the
quality of being clear. The color of the suspension is determined through an
observation of the changes in the color of suspensions.
For suspension A with 0.0 g of
tragacanth powder, the texture is coarse and less viscous. The absence of the
tragacanth as the suspending agent caused the suspensions to sediment very fast
and the particles separated into two distinct boundaries and become less
viscous . This makes the clarity of the suspensions to be clearer and less
cloudy due to separation of water from the insoluble ingredients. The color is
white at the bottom and colorless at the top of the suspensions.
For
suspension B with 0.1 g tragacanth powder, we can see that the texture is quite
smooth with very little sediment at first and the suspension is more viscous
than suspension A. This may be by the presence of the suspending agent which
helps to prevent settlement of the suspended solids under gravity. The clarity
of this suspensions is opaque compared with the clear suspensions A because the
suspensions do not seem to separate into two separate layers and they mix
together .The color is white.
Lastly,
for suspension C with much higher amounts of tragacanth powder, 0.3 g, the
texture is very smooth and very viscous compared to suspension B.This is
because an increase in the tragacanth powder helps to mix the excipients very
well and prevent sedimentation to occur at a fast rate. While the clarity is
much more cloudy because the excipients bind together and no sedimentation
occurs.The color is white,same with suspension B.
- Plot the Vu / Vo vs
time for each suspensions (Table 1) . Discuss the findings .
From
the graph shown above we can see that the sedimentation rate for suspension A
decreases with time while sedimentation rate for suspensions B and C increases
with time.
For
the suspension A , the sedimentation rate decreases over time because due to
absence of the suspending agent which is in this experiment is tragacanth
powder caused the suspensions to
sediment at a very fast rate after we shake it. So with time , the particles
will continue to sediment in a compact way thus will decreases the volume of
sediment.
For
the suspension B and C , due to presence of tragacanth powder as the suspending
agent , the suspensions tend to sediment in a lower rate and much lower with the
increase of the tragacanth powder in the formulation . Therefore , the sediment
process is very slower and with time , the volume of the sediment will be
increase .
Therefore
, suspension with no tragacanth powder will decrease the sedimentation rate while
suspensions with tragacanth powder will increase their sedimentation rate.
- Briefly explain the principle of analysis
using viscometer . Plot the viscosity vs tragacanth content (Table
2).Discuss the findings.
All fluids have an
internal friction between molecules, and this measures how well it flows. Due
to the internal friction, energy is required to move the liquid and viscosity
is the measure of the resistance to flow. A viscometer measures the torque
required to rotate a spindle in a fluid. The spindle is driven by a synchronous
motor through a calibrated spring and the deflection of the spring is displayed
by the viscometer. By changing speeds and spindles, a variety of viscosity
ranges can be measured. For a given viscosity, the viscous drag, or resistance
to flow (indicated by the degree to which the spring winds up), is proportional
to the spindle's speed of rotation and is related to the spindle's size and
shape. The drag increases with an increase of spindle's size and/or rotational
speed. For a given spindle geometry and speed, an increase in viscosity will be
indicated by an increase in the deflection of the spring. The minimum range is
obtained by using the largest spindle at the highest level; the maximum range by
using the smallest spindle at the slowest speed.
Based on the graph, viscosity of suspension is directly proportional to
the amount of Tragacanth used in the formulation. Tragacanth is a suspending
agent and also imparts viscosity to the solution. The viscosity of suspension should
increase when the amount of tragacanth increase. This is due to the function of
tragacanth as the thickening agent that reduce the surface tension between
particles of solid and liquid. Thus, it will reduce the movement of suspended
particles. Therefore,the higher the amount
of tragacanth powder , the higher the viscosity of the suspensions.
- After
storing the suspension for a period of 4 days, determine the ease of
redispersion of each.
After storing the suspension for a period of
4 days, product A can redispersed very easily because the active ingredient can
spread evenly in the solution by only 2 number of inversion. Product B can
redispersed moderately easy. The number of inversion is 6. This means that it
needs 6 times number of inversion for the active ingredient to redisperse in
the vehicle. Last, product C can hardly redispersed in the vehicle. This is
because the number of inversion for product C to redisperse is the highest,
which is 11. This indicates the time taken for the active ingredient in product
C to redispersed is the longest.
- Based
on all the observation, which product would be considered to be most
acceptable? Explain.
Based on the observation, product B will
be the most acceptable. This is because the amount of tragacanth,0.1g added
able to let the chalk dispersed evenly for enough period of time to be poured
and dispensed to the patients. Furthermore, it is not too viscous, the number
of inversion is 6. This indicates when
the suspension is being shaken, it will not take too long for the active
ingredient to redisperse. This will enable the patients to get the exact amount
of active ingredients inside the suspension as needed. Hence, it is most
acceptable product.
- Briefly
explain the function of each excipients used in the suspension
formulation. Explain the influence of tragacanth on the physical
characteristic and stability of a suspension.
In this experiment, chalk acts as an
active ingredient to determine the sedimentation rate of suspension after the
addition of tragacanth. Tragacanth acts as a wetting agent, also known as
surfactant. It is added to the suspension in order for the solid to disperse
evenly for longer time in the suspension. This can improve the stability of the
active ingredient. Concentrated peppermint water is a flavouring agent and
masks the unpleasant taste of the drug. It is added to the suspension to
increase the palatability of the suspension.
Syrup bp acts as a sweetening agent. Double Strength Chloroform water
acts as a preservative for the suspension. Distilled water will act as a
vehicle in a suspension.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the rate of
sedimentation and the height of sediment formed in the suspension was
influenced by the different amount of tragacanth
powder used to form the suspension. The higher the amount of tragacanth powder
used, the lower the height of sediment formed. This is because, the tragacanth
powder is a good suspending agent and their action prevents the solution from
forming sediment. Furthermore, we found that the viscosity of suspension also
increases as the amount of tragacanth powder increases. Viscosity of suspension
is important in reducing sedimentation rate. The higher the viscosity of the
suspension, the lower the sedimentation rate.
References
- http://intranet.tdmu.edu.ua/data/kafedra/internal/pharma_3/classes_stud/%D0%90%D0%9F%D0%A2%D0%95%D0%A7%D0%9D%D0%90%20%D0%A2%D0%95%D0%A5%D0%9D%D0%9E%D0%9B%D0%9E%D0%93%D0%86%D0%AF%20%D0%9B%D0%86%D0%9A%D0%90%D0%A0%D0%A1%D0%AC%D0%9A%D0%98%D0%A5%20%D0%97%D0%90%D0%A1%D0%9E%D0%91%D0%86%D0%92/%D1%84%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B9%20%D1%84%D0%B0%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%82/3%20%D0%BA%D1%83%D1%80%D1%81/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D1%86%D1%96%D1%8F/english/Suspensions.htm
- http://www.viscopedia.com/methods/measuring-principles/
- http://pharmlabs.unc.edu/labs/suspensions/stable.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment